• ENGLISH
  • ESPAÑOL
facebook
twitter
  • National>Entertainment
  • National>Local Economics
  • National>Local Politics
  • National>Society
  • National>Sports
BREAKING NEWS
Ecuador’s trade with Asia will take place directly from Posorja
The European Union authorizes the entry of aquaculture products from Ecuador
Guayaquil will activate cameras in 6,000 public buses, school buses and taxis
Beaches in Ecuador attract millionaire investments from real estate groups
The State will not release Glas and Salcedo for ‘irregularities’ in habeas corpus
The airline Arajet will connect the Dominican Republic with Ecuador
Land iguanas reappear in Galapagos and this is the reason
UN: Ecuador is the third country in the world that seizes the most drugs
Ecuador detects new case of monkeypox and adds seven
‘Narco generals’: Comptroller finds evidence of three police officers

Experts discussed ways to politicize justice in Ecuador

Posted On 04 May 2018

Ecuadornews:

 

Changes in the operating model of Ecuadorian justice, to improve quality and avoid political interference, were raised on Thursday, May 3 by political scientists, law professors and jurists.

During the forum, organized by the Platform for the Defense of Democracy and Human Rights of Ecuador, experts warned that it is a matter of time legal and constitutional reforms on justice.

The integration of the Council of the Judiciary (CJ), rethink the scope of its powers and the power to sanction, are the changes proposed by the political scientist Richard Ortiz, because otherwise the interference of the authorities of the CJ in the management of the judges

The ex-judge and lawyer in free exercise Milton Castillo considered that the CJ must have judges among its members, because they know the actions of justice and not only administrators.

The judicial career must be guaranteed, as well as the stability of the officials and the contests without political interference, he added.

The professor and consultant Luis Ávila recalled that when the CJ was integrated there was good faith and its powers and functions were clear, but this was modified in the popular consultation of 2011, in which the Government intervened by this mechanism to have judicial control.

Angelica Porras, a freelance attorney, agreed with her predecessors and also proposed that the faculty that has been given to the Council of Citizen Participation and Social Control (Cpccs) to elect judicial authorities be reviewed.

The jurist Juan Carlos Solines demanded a constant training of the administrators of justice and in it the role of the School of the Judicial Function.

For the political scientist Richard Ortiz, a judge with history, social recognition and affiliation to a political party is preferable to a new judge with titles, without a career who was assistant judge and who becomes servile in a sector.

“A judge with a track record guarantees independence and quality.” The conclusions will be announced this Friday, May 4, said Luis Valverde, organizer of the event. (I)

 

 

Source: https://www.eltelegrafo.com.ec/noticias/judicial/12/justicia-debate-ecuador

About the Author
  • google-share
Previous Story

Ideas of teachers to transform education were awarded

Next Story

Armando Valladares arrives in Ecuador to visit Galo Lara

SEARCH

LATEST NEWS

Ecuador's trade with Asia will take place directly from Posorja

Posted On 11 Aug 2022

The European Union authorizes the entry of aquaculture products from Ecuador

Posted On 11 Aug 2022

Guayaquil will activate cameras in 6,000 public buses, school buses and taxis

Posted On 10 Aug 2022
Copyright © 2010 - 2019. All Rights Reserved. EcuadorTimes.net