• ENGLISH
  • ESPAÑOL
facebook
twitter
  • National>Entertainment
  • National>Local Economics
  • National>Local Politics
  • National>Society
  • National>Sports
BREAKING NEWS
Ecuador’s oil production falls 51% due to national strike
Guillermo Lasso announces that the National Police and the Armed Forces will act with the necessary means to defend public order and democracy
“Cacerolazo” for Peace in Quito
Contecon will extend the free storage time by 40%, in support of the export sector affected by strikes
76.4% of Ecuadorians consider that the national strike should end after the dialogue, according to Cedatos
BanEcuador will forgive debts of up to USD 3,000 to 9% of its clients
Leonardo Bohrer-Nicolás Lapentti, a binomial with a sporting past that seeks to win the elections at the Guayaquil Tennis Club
Commercial sector experienced an economic blow on Father’s Day
Ecuador, among the countries that suffer the most from the war in Ukraine
Desperation in prisons is a ‘ticking time bomb’

Foreign experts denounce irregularities in the research of the 43 missing students

Posted On 09 Feb 2015
AFP

AFP

The Argentine Forensic Anthropology Team (EAAF for its Spanish acronym), which denounced numerous irregularities in the investigation of the 43 missing students in Mexico, said that the case can not be closed because there is no scientific evidence to confirm that the students were incinerated in a dumpster.

The EAAF ensured they were not present when the Attorney recovered the bag with bone fragments in the river San Juan and therefore, they can not attest where this sample was obtained from the sample, and which was later identified as belonging to the student Alexander Mora Venancio.

“The EAAF was convened by the PGR on the banks of the San Juan river when the bag was already open and it´s being analyzed by experts of the PGR. A significant number of fragments, apparently from that bag, were already exposed on a canvas.”

The experts explained they neither attended the harvesting of more evidence on November 15 because they did not receive notice of the action, even though the deal was to perform simultaneously all expert proceedings.

Regarding surveillance, they indicated that the site was unguarded and open to the public from 7 to 28 November, which “makes that the collected evidence in these conditions may be rejected as evidence.”

About the Author
  • google-share
Previous Story

The FARC indicates that they would change weapons by political action if guarantees are provided

Next Story

Parents of the 43 missing students in Mexico support allegations of foreign experts

SEARCH

LATEST NEWS

Ecuador's oil production falls 51% due to national strike

Posted On 24 Jun 2022

Guillermo Lasso announces that the National Police and the Armed Forces will act with the necessary means to defend public order and democracy

Posted On 24 Jun 2022

"Cacerolazo" for Peace in Quito

Posted On 23 Jun 2022
Copyright © 2010 - 2019. All Rights Reserved. EcuadorTimes.net